Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Boundaries topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mesa committee hears proposed boundary changes to move Wilson students into Franklin model and neighboring elementary schools
Summary
Mesa Unified District officials and the Planning and Boundary and Design Committee (PABDAC) held the third and final public hearing on proposed attendance-boundary changes affecting Wilson, Madison, Jefferson and Johnson elementary schools and the possible expansion of a Franklin-model campus onto the Wilson site.
Get email alerts on the School Boundaries topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mesa Unified District officials and the Planning and Boundary and Design Committee (PABDAC) held the third and final public hearing on proposed attendance-boundary changes affecting Wilson, Madison, Jefferson and Johnson elementary schools and the possible expansion of a Franklin-model campus onto the Wilson site.
The hearing, led by PABDAC chair Dr. Laura Metcalfe and district chief of staff Justin Wing, presented enrollment projections and a draft boundary map that would shift portions of Wilson’s current neighborhood into adjacent elementary schools and reserve the Wilson campus as a Franklin-model site if parents and the governing board support that option. PABDAC will consider public input before making a recommendation to the governing board in late October; the committee holds a virtual meeting on Sept. 29 to review materials.
PABDAC and district staff said the proposal responds to multi-year enrollment declines locally and nationally. Justin Wing, identified as the district’s chief of staff, told attendees that Wilson’s enrollment has fallen substantially in recent years and that the district is trying to “maximize our campuses” to avoid school closures other districts are already facing. District presenters showed a five-year decline at Wilson of about 40 percent and said Madison’s enrollment fell from about 469 students in 2021–22 to a projection of roughly 373 for the current year, with an interim projection as low as 349 earlier this year.
Under the proposed option discussed at the hearing, the Wilson campus would be used to host a Franklin-model program (referred to in presentations as “Franklin at Wilson”), while students in the gray-shaded areas on the draft map would be reassigned to Johnson, Madison or Jefferson elementary schools depending on their address. District staff said families from the Wilson attendance area would still be able to enroll their children in the Franklin program at Wilson, but those students and families must accept the Franklin model’s expectations and application process.
District staff described the Franklin model as a more structured, direct-instruction elementary program with higher academic expectations and additional parent involvement requirements. A district presenter identified as the Franklin East principal said, “Any child in the district who wants to go to Franklin can go to Franklin,” but stressed that families must complete a principal talk, attend a tour and agree to program expectations, including a stricter dress and grooming standard and daily homework expectations.
Staff outlined practical impacts and outstanding questions. The district said Franklin at Wilson would likely open initially as K–4 and convert to K–5 and later to a 6–12 bridge as demand and facilities allow. The existing Franklin campus has 55 classrooms; staff said a full K–12 conversion on that single site would require additional classrooms (described in the presentation as roughly 69 classrooms plus special-area space), so the district is evaluating use of nearby campuses to meet space needs.
On class size and staffing, district presenters said elementary class sizes typically run between 21 and 24 students and that staffing allocations follow the district’s longstanding formulas. The district noted a board procedure that generally waits until a class reaches about 30 students before adding another teacher; community members urged reconsideration of that threshold for lower grades. Staff said they will apply their standard staffing-allocation formula to projected enrollments and that additional teachers would be added if projections create larger cohorts.
Parents and residents asked about special-education services, English-language learners and the district’s promise to continue services under students’ Individualized Education Programs (IEPs). District staff said state requirements require continued delivery of IEP services and that English-language supports and translators would be used as needed. Staff also said transportation would follow existing guidelines: families within roughly a one-mile radius are not eligible for bus service; routes beyond that distance would be provided consistent with district policy. For specialized programs (for example, the Rise and Soar program currently at Madison and a preschool program at Johnson), staff said program moves have not been finalized and would be determined through the district’s annual review of specialized programs.
District outreach for the boundary process included mailed notices, ParentSquare messages and flyers. Presenters said the U.S. Postal Service confirmed delivery of about 31,000 mailers to homes in the four elementary boundaries and that roughly 6,000 families were notified through ParentSquare. Staff encouraged families to provide feedback via the district’s boundary email (boundaries@mpsaz.org) and said answers from the hearing would be added to the district FAQ web page.
No formal vote or board decision was taken at the hearing. PABDAC will collect public comment and forward a recommendation to the governing board later in October; any final boundary changes would require governing-board action.
Next steps noted at the hearing included PABDAC’s virtual meeting on Sept. 29 to review hearing materials and the governing board’s consideration in late October. The district asked families with questions to use the posted QR code or the boundaries email address for follow-up.

