Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Bridges topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Infrastructure committee forwards Culverton bridge aid resolution to county board

5785600 · September 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Marathon County Infrastructure Committee voted 5-0 to recommend a resolution concerning Culverton bridge aid after staff reported smaller-than-expected local Bridge Aid requests and explained federal/local funding splits on bridge projects.

The Marathon County Infrastructure Committee on Sept. 8 voted 5-0 to recommend a resolution concerning Culverton bridge aid be forwarded to the county board.

Committee members heard from the county highway commissioner, who said the committee packet included a resolution and that “this year's projects totaled about $341,000,” a figure the commissioner described as “considerably less than last year.” The commissioner attributed the decline to postponed township projects and a year in which many bridge projects received full federal funding, reducing local-bridge-aid reimbursements.

The highway commissioner said bridge projects are typically funded about 80% by federal dollars and 20% locally, with individual bridge project costs ranging from roughly $350,000 to nearly $1 million. Because many projects in the current cycle received full federal funding, local reimbursement requests through Bridge Aid were minimal; the commissioner said most local-Share reimbursements were “0 in most of them,” with one locality reporting about $1,400 and several reporting small overages they had to absorb.

Vice Chair Dickinson moved to recommend approval of the resolution; Soybert seconded. The committee recorded a 5-0 recommendation to forward the resolution to the county board later that evening.

The committee did not take further action on the resolution; forwarding it to the county board means the final decision rests with the full board.