Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Political Violence Resolution topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clark County council debates wording of resolution denouncing political violence
Summary
Councilors discussed a proposed resolution condemning political violence, including the assassination of national figures, with differing views on whether to name victims and whether to broaden the language to include other forms of violence and prevention measures.
Get email alerts on the Political Violence Resolution topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Councilor Belcock introduced a draft resolution condemning political violence and "the assassination of Charlie Kirk," asking the council to consider a unified statement against violence.
The measure drew immediate discussion among councilors over scope and tone: some members recommended broadening the resolution to condemn "violence in all its forms," including school shootings, while others supported naming recent victims as examples. Councilor Little said she would "respectfully decline leaving Charlie Kirk's name out of this" and noted the council previously named George Floyd in a 2021 resolution.
Chair Marshall and other councilors urged language that emphasized unity and constructive responses to violence. Councilor Young suggested adding proactive elements such as conflict-resolution resources or funding for prevention programs; Councilor Little asked staff to produce alternative drafts for the council to consider.
Jordan Bogie, senior policy analyst, said he would prepare revised versions based on the discussion and email them to council members for consideration ahead of a final vote planned at a subsequent meeting.
Councilor Belcock also raised local safety concerns, saying she had learned of an alleged effort to "incite rioting and violence" in Battleground tied to upcoming events and said she would share details with the chair and the sheriff.
The council did not take a final vote on the resolution on Sept. 17; staff were directed to circulate revised draft language that would either broaden the condemnation to include multiple forms of violence or provide named examples, per council guidance.

