Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tlc Governance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

TLC opposes proposal to add licensed drivers to its board; advocates split on approach

5785167 · September 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

TLC testified in opposition to Intro 139, which would expand the Taxi and Limousine Commission board to add two licensed-driver commissioners. Agencies warned of conflict-of-interest concerns while some driver advocates urged driver representation or licensing experience requirements for commissioners.

The Taxi and Limousine Commission told the Council committee it opposes Intro 139, which would increase the TLC board from nine to 11 members by adding two commissioners who must hold valid TLC driver's licenses.

TLC testimony David Do, commissioner and chair of the Taxi and Limousine Commission, told the committee that requiring active licensees to serve as commissioners raises conflict-of-interest concerns because commissioners adjudicate penalties, rule on safety standards and decide driver pay and other matters that directly affect licensees. "Commissioners must be impartial," Do said, and suggested the council consider appointing commissioners with "past TLC related experience" rather than active licensees.

Driver groups and other stakeholders Some driver advocates countered that the commission lacks sufficient driver expertise. Jeremy Moskowitz of Voyager Global Mobility and others suggested all commissioners undergo the TLC licensing process or that at least certain seats be filled by people with licensee experience; other witnesses recommended reconstituting the administrative advisory board that already provides driver and owner input.

Policy and legal considerations Paul Bader, an existing commissioner noted in testimony, said the administrative code already provides for an advisory board with driver and owner representation and recommended reconstituting that advisory board. Several witnesses also flagged the adjudicatory role of commissioners and said active licensees on a panel that adjudicates license suspensions and revocations could create a conflict of interest.

Ending: The committee did not vote on Intro 139 at the hearing. TLC said it is willing to work with the council to ensure drivers' voices are heard without impairing commissioners' ability to act impartially.