Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Glocester council discloses executive-session vote and authorizes finance staff to assume school accounting duties
Summary
At a brief reconvened session, Glocester councilors disclosed a vote taken in executive session to authorize the council president to send a letter to the school board and voted to allow the finance director to assign the Glocester School Department's accounting duties to finance office staff.
Glocester councilors reconvened to open session and disclosed that one vote was taken in executive session under “potential litigation” to authorize the council president to send a letter to the school board; the council also voted to permit the town finance director to assign the Glocester School Department’s financial accounting duties to finance office staff.
The disclosure and the vote-sealing action were introduced by an unnamed speaker who said, “I m gonna make a motion to reconvene to open session. I isclose 1 vote was taken in exec executive session under...potential litigation. This was to authorize the president to send a letter to the school board. We wanna seal the minutes and close to the interim session,” (Speaker 1).
A separate motion to “authorize the finance director to assign financial accounting duties of the school department to finance office staff” was moved by a different unnamed speaker (Speaker 2). During brief discussion Speaker 2 said, “As far as discussion goes, the main reason for this is workflow and workload to ... help assist in ... making that better for the ... finance department,” describing the change as intended to address staff workload.
A roll call recorded two named councilors voting in favor: Councilor Burlyton (Aye) and Councilor Koligian (Aye). The transcript records voice votes of "Aye" for the finance assignment motion but does not list a full roll-call for that item. The council recorded that the executive-session minutes would be sealed in connection with the litigation matter and the authorization given to the president to send the letter to the school board.
Neither the transcript nor the motions specify the council president—y name, the text or recipient address of the letter to the school board, any monetary amounts related to the accounting change, nor an effective date for the reassignment of duties. The minutes were directed to be sealed because the action originated in an executive session on potential litigation.
The meeting concluded after these actions; no further public details about the litigation matter or changes to staff assignments were provided on the record.
