Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Gallatin council holds public hearing on Foxland Harbor marina amid dispute over Corps lease, dredging, traffic and rentals

5784576 · September 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A packed public hearing on the proposed Foxland Harbor marina drew hours of testimony Wednesday as residents, environmental advocates and the developer clashed over a Corps of Engineers lease, dredging needs, traffic safety and whether short‑term rentals would be allowed under the zoning change.

The Gallatin City Council on Sept. 16 held a public hearing on an ordinance to approve an amended preliminary master development plan for Foxland Harbor Marina, a mixed marina-and-residential project on Old Hickory Lake. Councilman Carter introduced the ordinance and declared the hearing open; the hearing concluded the same night with no final vote.

Supporters and opponents filled the council chamber and spoke at length. Tom Lee, an attorney for Friends of Old Hickory Lake, told the council he and his group had obtained a March 6, 2025 Department of the Army lease for commercial concession purposes between the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the marina developer, Foxland Harbor Marina LLC. Lee said the lease requires the developer to follow a five‑phase “use and development plan,” limits the lease term to 25 years (extendable twice), gives the Corps written approval authority over development-plan changes and permits the Corps to review and, if necessary, set concession prices. “This is a lease for commercial concession purposes,” Lee said, and “the Corps is a present landlord” whose written approval is required before structures are erected.

Lee warned the lease and the plan the Corps approved differ in material ways from the plan before the council: the Corps’ exhibit describes phased construction with infrastructure and 186 wet slips, parking and fuel facilities in phase 1, and other land‑based elements later. By contrast, the city’s plan presented to the council does not phase boat-slip construction, omits certain land…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans