Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Workforce Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council Approves Workforce Investment Board Membership After Debate About Representation
Summary
The council approved the permanent Workforce Investment Board and its bylaws, approving a membership structure and bylaw choices after members raised concerns about minority and labor representation and board authority over large federal/state workforce funds.
The Los Angeles City Council approved the Workforce Investment Board and its governing bylaws on July 26, 2000, moving the interim board toward permanent status. Council debate focused on the board’s membership balance between business and mandated partner representatives, the presence of labor and minority representation on the board, and governance of approximately $148 million in workforce-development funds (transcript references the larger program total at roughly $296 million when youth programs and related funds were included in discussion).
Councilmembers asked staff and board representatives detailed questions about the bylaws, including whether smaller steering or executive committees would meet more regularly than the full board, how many labor representatives would participate, whether mandated partners’ roles (HUD, Vocational Education/Carl Perkins, TANF/GAIN) were being covered by dual-role appointees, and what protections would be in place to ensure participation from disadvantaged communities. Board representatives said the bylaws were designed to remain consistent with state/federal legislation while allowing some flexibility; they also said they had tried to cover mandated partners by assigning some members to represent multiple statutory roles.
Action: the council approved the majority report establishing the Workforce Investment Board and its bylaws (roll call recorded in the transcript as approved). Councilmembers asked the board and staff to continue close attention to outreach and selection practices to ensure broader participation from minority and disadvantaged communities and to monitor the board’s nominating committee procedures.
Why it matters: the Workforce Investment Board will oversee substantial workforce-development funding and program design intended to serve unemployed and disadvantaged residents. Councilmembers said strong local representation and transparent selection are critical because private-sector participation and mandated partner roles will shape who benefits from training and placement services.
Speakers included the board’s staff representative, council sponsor(s), and a number of council members who raised questions about representation, including concerns that appointees should reflect the city’s racial and economic diversity.
