Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Public questions and board responses focus on Stantec subcontract, Provost & Pritchard work and Blue Mountain involvement
Summary
Public commenters and board members questioned why Stantec was engaged as a subcontractor to Provost & Pritchard on design and environmental work; staff explained Stantec was included in PNP's proposal and that Blue Mountain Development was added for outside review and expertise, not to replace the prime consultant.
Public commenters raised concerns about the project team and rising costs for environmental and design work on the Authority’s consolidation/pipeline project, asking why Stantec had been subcontracted and why Blue Mountain Development was brought on board.
Caller Mike Sennott asked why Stantec was involved and whether Provost & Pritchard had subcontracted to Stantec without the board’s knowledge; he expressed concerns about cost overruns and questioned whether the prime consultant had performed work in-house. Staff responded that Provost & Pritchard (PNP) included Stantec in its proposal and…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
