Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Construction topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves geotechnical survey for Bath County Middle School; Solid Ground recommended as low bidder

5782959 · September 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved a geotechnical survey contract for the Bath County Middle School renovation, selecting Solid Ground as the lowest bidder with a quoted geotechnical cost of about $6,500; staff said the work will inform underground utility and seismic design.

The Bath County Board of Education approved a geotechnical-services contract for the Bath County Middle School renovation on Sept. 15, selecting Solid Ground as the recommended bidder to perform targeted borings and report on subsurface conditions.

Jonathan, a staff member presenting the recommendation, told the board that three quotes were received and that the lowest quote with the shortest turnaround time was from Solid Ground. He said the borings would be performed at a few locations where new water lines to an annex, a proposed gas line to the kitchen, and the mechanical yard are planned, and that the resulting geotechnical report will inform seismic design and decisions about soil replacement depth for underground work.

Jonathan said the board had budgeted for both topographic and geotechnical surveys and that the geotechnical item currently under consideration was about $6,500; he added that prior topographic work had been approved earlier and that the combined survey costs were still below original budget estimates.

Why it matters: the geotechnical report will influence foundation, underground utility and seismic design for the middle school renovation and can affect construction scope and costs.

Vote: the board approved the recommendation; the motion was made by Carla and seconded by Eric.

Implementation note: staff said Solid Ground was recommended because of cost and turnaround time; the work will include select borings and a report to guide excavation and soil-replacement decisions.