Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Revere Local board reviews multiple student-policy updates; no action taken at work session
Summary
At a Sept. 9 work session, the Revere Local Board of Education reviewed several revised policies — including interdistrict open enrollment for military families, absences for driver’s education, student-discipline appeal timing, and cellphone rules — and took no formal action.
Get email alerts on the School Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Revere Local Board of Education reviewed a package of revised student and administrative policies at its Sept. 9 work session and did not take action, board members said.
Board members and district staff discussed updates that the administration said reflect new state law or routine administrative changes. Key changes reviewed included: removal of an application deadline for interdistrict open enrollment for children of active-duty military families; a new absence category allowing up to eight hours for behind-the-wheel driver’s-education training; removal of the 14-day deadline language from the expulsion-appeal section; an explicit superintendent authority to bar students from graduation ceremonies as part of discipline; and updates to the district’s electronic device (cellphone) policy to align with a recent state law.
Administrators described the interdistrict open-enrollment change as an amendment intended to ensure children of service members may enroll without a district-imposed deadline. The driver’s-education change clarifies that the eight hours cited by the law may be taken in blocks (staff said two-hour segments are common for behind-the-wheel instruction). The board discussed wording around whether those hours must be consecutive and whether the policy’s phrasing should be tightened for clarity.
On student discipline, the draft language adds reasons for removal, suspension or expulsion and specifies that the superintendent may prohibit a student from participating in graduation ceremonies where those sanctions apply. The draft also removes a separately stated 14-day appeal deadline in one subsection; staff pointed to other subsections that still require notice and a 14-day postmark deadline for an intent to appeal. Board members asked staff to verify that the policy does not create an indefinite appeals window and to confirm any applicable statutory deadlines.
The cellphone policy changes were described by staff as required by a recent state law; administrators reported preliminary positive feedback from pilots and said infractions have been low. Staff reported that classroom-authorized phone use for instruction or for students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) or 504 plans remains allowed under the draft language.
Board members did not vote on the proposed changes at the work session. Staff presented the revisions for review and directed board members to raise any wording or implementation concerns ahead of the next regular meeting, when the district may consider formal adoption.
Ending — The board scheduled those revised policies for further review at the regular meeting cycle; no final action was recorded at the Sept. 9 work session.

