Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Credit Recovery Programs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Petaluma board discusses high cost of Edgenuity credit-recovery licenses and explores lower-cost options
Summary
Board members questioned the expense of the district’s Edgenuity site license for credit recovery, noting about 27 students currently enrolled; staff said a site license is the best available value but staff are exploring alternatives including UC Scout and a free option through a community college.
Board members raised questions about the cost-effectiveness of the district’s Edgenuity credit-recovery licenses and asked staff to pursue alternatives.
A district staff member said the district had reviewed per‑pupil pricing and determined that, for now, a site license is the most cost-effective arrangement. The staff member said about 27 students are currently enrolled in Edgenuity credit-recovery courses and that staff are exploring other options, including a community college offering free credit-recovery and other vendors.
Board members pointed to UC Scout as a possible lower-cost alternative, noting UC Scout’s per‑pupil pricing in the $50–$70 range; by contrast, the district’s Edgenuity costs were discussed in the meeting as roughly in the several-hundred‑to‑about‑$800 range per student, though no formal contract-cost figure was read into the record. Staff said they had already discussed a free option offered by a California junior college and would pursue additional options and follow up with the board.
Why it matters: credit-recovery programs affect seniors’ ability to graduate on time and can represent a material budget line for district discretionary spending. Exploring lower-cost providers could reduce district expenditures while maintaining a pathway for students to earn missing credits.
What the record shows: staff confirmed the site license was active and that the district intends to continue exploring alternatives; the board urged staff to return with comparative costs and outcomes for any proposed replacement.
