Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Applicant seeks rezoning from AR to BG for Walnut Shade Road parcel; applicant says staff report is incorrect
Summary
John Nichols Jr. asked the Kent County Regional Planning Commission to rezone a 6.29-acre Walnut Shade Road parcel from AR to BG, disputing the staff report and citing nearby commercial development and planning designations.
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
John Nichols Jr. presented a rezoning application (CZ-25-3) seeking to change a 6.29-acre parcel on the north side of Walnut Shade Road from AR (agriculture-residential) to BG (general business/highway commercial).
Nichols told the commission the staff recommendation report was "inconsistent and wrong in many respects," and argued the parcel is within the county's Woodside Village area and the state's investment levels 2 and 3 under the 2020 state strategies, placing it inside Kent County's growth overlay zone. He also said four rezoning actions have occurred in the immediate vicinity over the past 40 years and that an industrially zoned property adjoins his site to the north. "Public sewer is neither necessary nor required for my intended use of the property. Water and fire suppression facilities are already in place," Nichols said.
Nichols said he had neighbor support letters and that county agencies—he named the Department of Public Works, Kent Conservation District, DelDOT and the Dover/Kent County MPO—raised no objections to the requested rezoning. A commissioner who said he lives in the area noted several existing businesses nearby, including a convenience store and a Dollar General, and told Nichols he thought "the general business has moved in that area." Nichols agreed with that assessment.
Why it matters: Rezoning this parcel to BG would permit a broader array of commercial uses along an arterial (US Route 13 vicinity) and could change the character of the immediate neighborhood. The application will be considered at the commission's business meeting on Sept. 11; no decision was made at the hearing.
Next steps: The public hearing record will remain open for two business days; the commission will not accept new public testimony at the Sept. 11 business meeting and will make a decision then if a common vote of four members is achieved.

