Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioner: recent DOC funding formula leaves Clay County bearing extra probation costs
Summary
In a committee report, Commissioner Ebinger said a funding formula enacted by the state shifted certain probation costs onto counties like Clay, disproportionately affecting border counties; he said a legislative fix is needed and warned the county may have to consider cuts if state funding isn't adjusted.
Commissioner Ebinger reported to the Clay County Board of Commissioners on Sept. 9 that a funding structure enacted by the state Legislature has left Clay County bearing significant costs for probation and parole supervision that were expected to be covered differently under the new formula.
Ebinger said he, Dale Adams (county probation director) and other staff met with Carter Dears, assistant commissioner with the Minnesota Department of Corrections, to review the impacts. County presenters told the board the state formula creates an unintended disincentive for counties because individuals who meet rehabilitation goals and are removed from active supervision may no longer be funded at the same level by the state. Some larger counties reportedly continue to draw funds even when individuals are placed on passive status; Clay County's implementation of the DOC model means when probationers are advanced off active supervision the county's state payments drop.
Ebinger said Clay County currently runs a model program and that achieving the desired outcome—people completing programming and moving off active supervision—paradoxically reduces state funding to the county. He said the issue will likely require legislative correction and that any interim remedy will be difficult; without legislative change the board will face budgetary pressure and may need to consider personnel reductions to remain balanced.
County staff noted additional costs tied to cross‑border probation cases and report‑preparation costs that are not currently distributed statewide, a factor that disproportionately affects border counties like Clay. Ebinger said the Department of Corrections acknowledged flaws in the funding approach and that follow‑up with state legislators is underway. No formal board action was taken at the meeting; Ebinger said the item will inform upcoming budget deliberations.
Provenance: Commissioner Ebinger report and Q&A (s:2024.485–e:2611.51).
