Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Vacant Land And Blight Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
North Canton council opens discussion on how to address blighted vacant land
Summary
City officials discussed whether to expand vacant-property rules to include vacant land, weighing registration, nuisance enforcement and targeted anti‑blight definitions; staff will review code and report back.
North Canton city officials discussed options for addressing blighted vacant land during the Committee of the Whole meeting Sept. 15, emphasizing a preference for targeted anti‑blight rules over broad, punitive measures.
The discussion, prompted by the mayor, centered on whether the city should expand existing vacant‑building registration and enforcement to cover vacant land that is blighted but not for sale. “I just wanna have an open discussion and maybe get some ideas for it,” the mayor said as the item began.
City staff and council members said many Ohio municipalities focus vacant‑property registries on buildings rather than land, and that land raises different practical and legal questions. Jason (staff member) said North Canton’s relative lack of blighted properties is a strength but warned that “one blighted property can lead to others pretty quickly.” He and others recommended that the city review local code definitions and enforcement options before drafting any new program.
Speakers suggested several approaches: a registration or inventory to identify vacant commercial parcels, stronger nuisance or blight code language tailored to the city’s needs, and data collection on whether a parcel causes safety problems, economic decline or other harms. Jason recommended defining ‘‘blight’’ carefully and focusing enforcement on properties that display appearance or safety problems or that depress nearby values. “Focusing on blight is probably a better approach,” he said.
Council members and staff cautioned against overbroad rules that would treat all vacant land the same. Participants noted examples such as wooded lots and garden plots that are vacant but are used informally and are not necessarily harmful. One council member framed registration as a potential economic development tool—an inventory the city could use to promote properties—rather than strictly a punitive measure.
No ordinance or formal motion was introduced on the item at the meeting. Council members asked staff and the law director to review current codes related to nuisance and blight, evaluate options used by other communities, and return with recommendations.
Council members said they wanted a measured policy that preserves useful vacant spaces while giving the city tools to address genuinely blighting parcels.
