Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Health Services Local Government topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Appropriations Clears AB 870 to Let Small Alpine County Contract with Neighboring County for Child Health Services
Summary
The committee advanced AB 870, a targeted bill allowing Alpine County to contract with a neighboring county to administer California Children’s Services when local staffing is unavailable. The Department of Health Care Services provided technical feedback; the committee approved the measure without opposition.
The Senate Appropriations Committee approved Assembly Bill 870, a narrowly focused measure to let Alpine County contract with a neighboring county to operate the county’s California Children’s Services (CCS) program when local staffing prevents continued operation.
Assemblymember Hadwick said Alpine County — the state’s smallest by population — currently has a single nurse responsible for medically necessary services under CCS and that program operations are disrupted when that nurse is unavailable. The bill would permit a neighboring county to administer CCS on Alpine’s behalf under state standards.
Testimony from Jean Hurst representing Alpine County described the bill as a modest, urgent fix for a unique local situation. Department of Finance flagged a modest ongoing general fund cost estimate in the committee analysis — an estimate in the testimony noted roughly $78,000 — but committee discussion and amendments aimed to keep the bill technically consistent with Department of Health Care Services rules.
No witnesses testified in opposition. The committee recorded the motion to send AB 870 to the Senate floor as passed; during the hearing tally announcements showed unanimous support (committee recorded as 6 to 0 in roll calls). The bill’s author and county witness said the measure would bring “immense relief” to sick and disabled low-income children and their families in Alpine County.
Why it matters: AB 870 addresses a narrow operational problem for a geographically small county and would preserve continuity of care for medically fragile children by allowing inter-county administrative arrangements when local staffing is infeasible.
Next steps: The bill advances to the Senate floor. Committee members suggested minimal fiscal exposure for the state but noted staff would monitor the Department of Health Care Services’ regulatory processes and any one-time implementation costs.
