Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Right Of Way Permits Parking Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Evansville delays ruling on two right‑of‑way permit inquiries after property‑owner briefing

5876901 · September 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City of Evansville deferred action for two right‑of‑way permit inquiries (permit nos. 2339 and 2340) after a property owner described current uses of gravel areas in front of leased parcels and staff cited safety and uniform enforcement concerns. The board will revisit the issue in two weeks for an on‑site review.

The City of Evansville board deferred a decision on two right‑of‑way permit inquiries after a property owner described existing parking and staff warned about safety and uniform enforcement.

Mr. Lubitzky, city engineering staff, told the board that the two inquiries relate to the placement or use of material in the public right of way and that “we typically don't allow product to be placed in the right of way, as it may obstruct or add sight distance issues or other issues that would be important to the traveling public.”

Property owner Dave Condi of 5935 Cozy Caroline Road said he owns both properties at issue and described changes since he purchased one parcel 12 years ago. “When we purchased that property 12 years ago, we had it rezoned. We purchased it, it was gravel all the way out to New York Avenue,” Condi said. He asked whether tenants could continue to park in a gravel area that staff identified as within the right of way.

Board members and staff discussed whether angle parking would be feasible on gravel, past approvals for angle parking on a nearby parcel, and safety concerns about backing into a travel lane. Staff said they would inspect the site and bring the matter back to the board at the next regular meeting in two weeks. A motion to defer passed by voice vote.

Ending: The board directed staff to review the site with the property owner and engineering staff and to return with recommendations at the next meeting.