Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Boyertown policy committee agrees to forward several district policies to first reading
Summary
The Boyertown Area School District policy committee agreed to move a group of district policies to first reading and to hold several complex policies for further review, citing a three-year review schedule and PSBA guidance.
Get email alerts on the Policy Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Boyertown Area School District policy committee agreed during its policy meeting to send multiple district policies to a first reading and to hold more complex policies pending additional review.
Committee leadership said the district is using a three-year review window for policies and that policies older than three years are being flagged for review. “Policies guide a school district. Everything stems from the policies that are created, and we wanna make sure that they're current,” a policy staff member said.
The chair summarized the committee’s list, saying the policies the committee will move forward to a first read include policy 000, 001, 002, 003, 004 and 4.1. The chair also said policies 7, 8 and 11 are coming forward for a first read. The committee agreed to the chair’s summary.
Committee members described the color-coded review system presented in the packet: red items require review because they are older than the three‑year window; green items have newer draft attachments available for consideration; and black items are current and need no further action. The presenter said Policy 000 was adopted in February 2015 and has not been revised since, and several other policies show last revision dates outside the three‑year review threshold.
Members and staff agreed that not every policy needs language changes from the Pennsylvania School Boards Association (PSBA), but that the district should formally move older items through the committee and board‑reading process. The presenter asked the committee to advance the identified policies to a first read at the next meeting; chairs indicated assent.
The committee also identified a short list of policies to hold for additional work: policy 005, policy 006 and policy 6.1 were placed on hold while staff gather more information. The presenter said the district will return with more detail at a later committee meeting. The presenter told the committee it would coordinate legal review with Fox Rothschild for items where counsel input was needed.
Next steps: the policies the committee agreed to forward will be placed on the agenda for a first reading at a future board meeting and the held items will return after staff and counsel provide further analysis.

