Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Superintendent Search topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board to consider MCIU-led superintendent search; agreement on Sept. 29 agenda

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Superintendent search services proposed by the Montgomery County Intermediate Unit will appear on the board's Sept. 29 agenda. Administration said the IU conducts searches for no cost to member districts other than modest advertising expenses, and the IU's proposal includes a tentative timeline and a community survey in October.

Dr. Scanlon, Superintendent, told the board the Montgomery County Intermediate Unit (MCIU) submitted a proposal to conduct the district's superintendent search and that the administration will present the IU agreement on the Sept. 29 board agenda.

“There is a new timeline in there, that the board should approve officially so that the Montgomery County Intermediate Unit can go do its search,” Dr. Scanlon said, adding that the IU’s work typically carries no cost to districts beyond advertising expenses of up to about $3,500.

Dr. Scanlon described a tentative timeline the IU proposed: collect resumes and conduct interviews this fall and winter with a possible announcement in February, and noted that a successful candidate may have a 90–120 day hold in their current contract. The IU’s plan also calls for an online community survey in October to gather public input on desired superintendent qualifications.

Board members discussed whether the board should approve the IU agreement while leaving the timeline language flexible. Mrs. Hermans, Board member, suggested removing explicit dates from the agenda item so the board would not be forced to return to approve timing changes. Dr. Scanlon said approving the agreement would not prevent the board from adjusting dates later.

The item will be placed on the Sept. 29 agenda for formal board action; no formal vote occurred on Sept. 15.