Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Annexation Shoemaker Landing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Shoemaker Landing annexation introduced; staff questions Planned Residential District request

5862069 · September 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Shoemaker Landing LLC sought annexation for a 7.58-acre parcel and requested a Planned Residential District to permit up to 132 apartment units; city staff said the proposal as submitted did not meet PRD standards and recommended further work with planning commission and a developer presentation.

Shoemaker Landing Management LLC introduced a proposed annexation and zoning request for a 7.58-acre parcel along the north right-of-way of Shoemaker Drive intending to build five three-story apartment buildings with 132 dwelling units.

Staff described the petition as seeking a Planned Residential District (PRD) to achieve a density the petitioner said would be as high as 20 units per acre. "The development proposed is for 5 3 story apartment buildings with a total of a 132 dwelling units for a density of 17.4 units per acre," staff said. The city's most dense residential district, R‑5A, generally allows about 12 units per acre, staff noted.

City planning staff told council it reviewed the applicant's PRD request against Section 17‑1‑22(o)(10) of the municipal code and concluded the proposed plan did not appear to meet the code's PRD purpose — which emphasizes a mix of housing, open space and preservation of natural features. Staff said the petitioner should either pick an existing residential zone or propose additional PRD elements consistent with the code.

Council members requested a developer presentation and further clarification; staff said it would continue processing the petition and forward the matter to the planning commission when appropriate. No formal council vote occurred on the item at the work session.