Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the It Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kootenai County moves FY25 IT funds to cover sudden VMware price spike, plans longer-term IT review
Summary
County information-technology staff won approval to roll unspent FY2025 IT funds into FY2026 after a vendor renewal quote raised short-term costs; staff said the move buys time to evaluate alternatives and continue planned projects such as multifactor authentication and OnBase work.
Get email alerts on the It Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kootenai County IT staff won commissioner approval Sept. 23 to carry unspent fiscal-year-2025 IT funds forward into FY2026 to cover an unexpectedly large vendor renewal and to continue planned projects.
Grant Kinsey, network administrator, told the Board the county received a renewal quote for its VMware platform about three weeks before the meeting that raised the expected annual subscription cost to roughly five times the prior price. Kinsey said the county had budgeted to absorb typical renewals but the recent jump required a short-term funding fix so IT can evaluate alternatives without disrupting services.
"It is now 5 times what it used to be," Kinsey said, describing the Broadcom-era price increase for the product the county uses to run its data center. He said the carryforward would be a stopgap to pay for one more year of service while staff perform a market review and consider alternatives.
Kinsey outlined projects affected by the rollover request: continued implementation of multi-factor authentication (MFA); completion of a Recorder office online beverage-license project; and final professional services for the county's OnBase records/workflow system. He said OnBase work is nearly complete while the MFA and Recorder projects require additional FY26 funds to finish.
Kinsey estimated the county's core infrastructure currently carries an annual outlay on the order of $200,000 and said a multi-year replacement or migration plan could total roughly $1 million over five years. He asked that unspent FY25 dollars in the IT budget be moved into FY26 to provide a roughly $100,000–$150,000 stopgap while staff evaluate long-term options.
Commissioners approved the carryforward motion. Commissioner Eberlein, Commissioner Duncan and Chair Metairie each voted aye; the motion carried.
The county did not approve a final multi-year procurement at this meeting. Kinsey told commissioners he will return with options and cost comparisons once staff have evaluated alternatives and the likely fiscal impact over a multi-year horizon.
The action preserves funding for near-term IT continuity and planned modernization work while creating time for procurement analysis and vendor comparison.

