Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Urban Renewal topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commerce City URA continues two affordable‑housing items to Oct. 20 and enters executive session over deed

5813069 · September 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Commerce City Urban Renewal Authority agreed to continue two URA agenda items related to Tract F/affordable housing to Oct. 20, 2025, and then entered an executive session to receive legal advice on a special warranty deed.

The Commerce City Urban Renewal Authority voted to continue two agenda items related to Tract F/affordable‑housing matters to Oct. 20, 2025, and then moved into an executive session for legal advice related to a special warranty deed.

URA Chair (Mayor) Douglas and board members approved a motion to continue Resolution URA-2025-008 (First Amendment to Declaration of Covenants) to October 20, 2025. The continuance was requested by representatives for Tract F, LLC, who said a title company failed to timely deliver evidence of property ownership and asked that Adams County representation be present because an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with Adams County is implicated. The applicant’s counsel, Rita Connerly of Fairfield and Woods, asked for the continuance; Joe Delzotto/Delzado of Del West Corporation also spoke for the applicant.

The URA then placed a related transfer item involving Tract F on the same October 20, 2025 continuance. Commissioners discussed flexibility about the date because an Adams County commissioner’s presence was viewed as important. The board recorded the motion as passed; the clerk later clarified online votes from a commissioner who had been on the phone.

After those procedural votes the URA voted 9–0 (with five excused absences reported) to enter an executive session pursuant to the Colorado Open Meetings Act citation given in the meeting as CRS 24‑6‑402(4)(b) "for the purpose of receiving legal advice related to a special warranty deed." The motion to enter executive session passed and the board recessed for an executive session estimated to last about 30 minutes. The public meeting recording remained live while the executive session proceeded.

Why it matters: The continuances defer action on documents that the URA and the developer say are tied to an Adams County intergovernmental agreement and to evidence of land ownership. Entering executive session on the special warranty deed signals the URA expects legal questions important enough to discuss in private within the statutory exception for attorney–client communications.

What’s next: Staff said the URA will bring an IGA amendment and the continued items back on Oct. 20, 2025 (or a date to be confirmed), after confirming availability of Adams County representatives. The executive‑session topic was described only as legal advice on a special warranty deed; no formal action on the deed was recorded in the public minutes during this meeting.

Sources and evidence: Meeting transcript (discussion and motions to continue URA‑2025‑008 and to continue the Tract F transfer; motion and roll call to enter executive session under CRS 24‑6‑402(4)(b)).