Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves staff conditions for 238 Quintin Drive railing: height and material standards to apply
Summary
The technical council approved staff-recommended conditions for a certificate of appropriateness at 238 Quintin Drive that limit railing height and outline acceptable materials; the applicant had sought a taller railing and wrought-iron panels.
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The city-appointed technical council voted to approve staff-recommended conditions on a certificate of appropriateness for 238 Quintin Drive after a detailed discussion about railing height, materials and consistency with existing features.
Applicant Ron Hubbard asked the council to permit a taller railing—approximately 4 feet—citing safety and mobility concerns; staff recommended a more traditional wood railing or an appropriate wrought-iron design and proposed a 36-inch (3-foot) height as the standard for residential railings. Members referenced applicable standards and the appearance of existing features, noting the structure atop the garage had stood at about 6 feet since 2007.
Hubbard said he could follow staff guidance but sought flexibility so that he could use wrought-iron panels similar to those on the house’s first-floor railing. "I would like it to be 4 feet because I'm 65 years old and I don't want to worry about bumping into the railing," Hubbard said. Council members and staff discussed the visual consistency between the proposed iron panels above the garage and the first-floor railing; some members expressed concern that introducing a new material or height would create an inconsistent appearance.
Staff clarified that the recommendation was not to mandate a mixed metal-and-wood railing but to prefer a traditional design; staff also noted the residential code minimum/typical railing height is 36 inches, with a higher standard commonly used for commercial properties. After discussion a motion to support the staff recommendation (including the recommended height and material guidance) passed on a unanimous voice/roll call: Davis, García, Brigarde, Spiller, Fullerton, Pollock and Vásquez voted yes.
The council directed the applicant to work with staff to finalize a design that meets the preservation standards. No appeal or further deadlines were specified at the meeting.
