Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Boise City Council approves Curtis Creek subdivision at 1720 Curtis Road
Summary
The Boise City Council approved a preliminary and final plat for the Curtis Creek Subdivision, allowing four buildable lots and one common lot on roughly 0.55 acres after staff recommended approval and the applicant agreed to conditions.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Boise City Council approved a preliminary and final plat for the Curtis Creek Subdivision, a residential development of four buildable lots and one common lot on approximately 0.55 acres at 1720 Curtis Road.
Planning staff presented the proposal and recommended approval. The planner said, "The planning team recommends approval of the preliminary and final plan," and described the site as a flag lot with a service drive providing vehicular and pedestrian access, a five-foot sidewalk on the drive's north side, and landscaping along the south side. The project uses provisions of a previously approved planned unit development (PUD) under the legacy zoning code to allow internal deviations such as reduced lot sizes and setbacks.
The council asked about agreement with staff conditions; the applicant confirmed concurrence. No neighborhood association representatives appeared and no public testimony was offered on the record. Councilmembers present voted unanimously to approve Subdivision 25-0030 as moved and seconded during the meeting.
The staff memo and project packet identify recommended conditions of approval; the council approved the subdivision subject to those conditions. The transcript records two different directional qualifiers for the property address ("1720 South Curtis Road" and "1720 West Curtis Road"); the official recorded address was not specified in the meeting record.
The preliminary and final plat approval completes the council-level land-use action recorded in the meeting; staff identified no additional city-directed follow-up during the discussion.

