Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Setbacks And Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission questions 25-foot rear setback; requests more review before ordinance changes
Summary
Commissioners debated the rationale for a 25-foot rear setback for single-family dwellings versus much smaller setbacks for accessory buildings and asked staff to consult safety officials and return with recommendations.
Commissioners questioned the existing 25-foot rear setback for single-family dwellings—contrasted with accessory buildings that in the code may have much smaller setbacks—and asked staff to reexamine the rule and consult the fire marshal before proposing ordinance changes.
Commissioner Jim noted examples of grandfathered (irregular) lots where a strict 25-foot rear setback could prevent reasonable house placement and urged that the commission consider whether the rear setback should match auxiliary-building privileges (such as 2 feet for sheds) or be adjusted downward (e.g., 12 feet) where appropriate. Others cautioned that the 25-foot standard exists in many municipalities and may protect privacy and fire access; the group agreed that any change should be supported by safety input (fire department / marshal) and historic rationale.
No ordinance change was adopted. Commissioners asked staff to: - Consult with the fire marshal (Todd or current marshal) about safety reasons for the 25-foot rear setback and whether the requirement can be reduced or varied by lot type or neighborhood. - Bring a proposed amendment and staff recommendation to a future public meeting after gathering safety input and examples of problematic lots.
The commission did not vote to change setbacks at this meeting; it directed staff to research, consult safety officials and return with proposed text and examples.
