Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Code Definitions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission discusses reasonable-accommodations language and front-yard definitions; staff to draft changes
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed proposed amendments to the municipal reasonable-accommodations language and debated several draft methods for defining front yards and related lot definitions; staff was asked to research federal statutes and prepare revised language for a future meeting.
Members of the City of Brandon Planning and Zoning Commission discussed amendments to the municipal reasonable-accommodations language and a broader review of zoning-code definitions, including how to define front yards on irregular ("Z") lots.
Staff noted the packet contains older amendment text dating to 1988 and recommended updates to align municipal language with the Fair Housing Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Commissioners asked whether accommodations that remain after a resident moves would remain with the property; staff said they had not researched that point and would return with a memo.
On reasonable accommodations, commissioners emphasized that staff should interpret the code so that applicants pursue other reasonable options first and that exceptions should not be so broad as to undermine setback requirements. Staff said an exception already under discussion would allow replacement of certain nonconforming structures (like unsafe decks) without expanding the nonconformity but that the language needs clarification.
Commissioners also discussed multiple ways to define a front yard for irregularly shaped lots. Staff presented three draft approaches: (1) measure from the nearest point of the front wall, (2) a method that drapes the front yard line according to the front contours of the building, and (3) a line delineation that treats any area physically in front of the front door as front yard. Several commissioners favored a definition that treats the front yard as a line parallel to the front property line extended across the parcel at the furthest point of the front wall, arguing this would align yard definitions with how setbacks are established.
Commissioners asked staff to prepare a fourth draft definition that incorporates their feedback and to research how peer cities address Z‑lot configurations and accessory‑structure limits (some commissioners cited Sioux Falls rules as a reference). Staff agreed to return with revised language and legal references at a future meeting.
No formal vote was taken on the ordinance language or definitions at the meeting; the commission left the items on the agenda for further study.
