Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Youth Services Grants topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City relinquishes state child‑care grant after staff review finds compliance and capacity gaps

5782023 · September 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The city returned a proposed California Department of Social Services after‑school child‑care award after staff concluded the department lacked the time, institutional capacity and facility upgrades to meet Title 22/Title 5 and CDSS compliance requirements within the grant start period.

City management notified the council that the city relinquished a proposed award from the California Department of Social Services to stand up an after‑school child‑care program after staff review found the city lacked the time, staffing, facility and compliance capacity required by the state terms.

Assistant City Manager Kat Downs presented an informational report explaining the decision. Staff said the award would have supported programming for as many as 515 children across seven city locations and that the initial award amount for start‑up was approximately $915,000. Downs said the CDSS local agreement references an 81‑page set of state terms and conditions and numerous cross‑references to state law and regulations. Staff told the council they would have needed specialized computer systems for attendance and eligibility audits, staff trained to Title 22/Title 5 standards, medical and background‑check compliance or “Raptor”‑style screening, and potential facility upgrades such as child‑scale restrooms to comply with licensing standards.

Downs said the city reviewed staffing options and considered recruiting experienced program staff and outside legal and consulting expertise, but the combination of short timeframes, the breadth of regulatory obligations and potential audit exposure and liability led management to conclude the city could not implement the program in the initial funding period. The La Habra program — cited by staff as a local model — took decades to develop and uses a dedicated department with long institutional experience.

Staff recommended — and the council received and filed the informational report — that the city not accept the award under the current terms. Downs and other staff said the city will continue to pursue other grant opportunities and consider partnerships (the school district was mentioned as a likely partner) to expand after‑school and child‑care services using models that match the city’s operational capacities.

No funding was accepted and no program was launched; staff said they will discuss alternative opportunities to expand youth programming consistent with city resources.