Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Palo Alto council hears prescreening for 414 California Avenue rezoning; no binding action taken
Summary
City Council members on Sept. 15 reviewed a prescreening request to rezone 414 California Avenue from community commercial to Planned Home Zoning to allow a six‑story building with ground‑floor retail and 37 housing units.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City Council members on Sept. 15 reviewed a prescreening request to rezone 414 California Avenue from community commercial to Planned Home Zoning to allow a six‑story building with ground‑floor retail and 37 housing units. The prescreening is an early, nonbinding step; council members gave informal feedback but took no formal vote.
The proposal would redevelop the former Bank of the West site near the California Avenue Caltrain station into a mixed‑use project with 14 rental units, 23 condominiums, about 16,000 square feet of retail/restaurant space and below‑grade parking. Senior planner Emily Callas told the council the conceptual design would exceed several development limits under the city's Housing Incentive Program: proposed height of 83 feet where 60 feet is the program maximum, a proposed floor‑area ratio of 3.57:1 where 2.6:1 would be allowed, and reduced or zero setbacks on Mimosa Lane where five feet is required.
Staff also said the project proposes 88 parking spaces (including credits tied to the California Avenue parking district) when 161 would be required under the housing incentive program and that a Transportation Demand Management plan would be required. Callas said the project’s usable open space calculation would not meet the base 150 square feet per unit standard because several balconies are too shallow to qualify under the city's definition.
Architect Zoltan Polly described the design as a "truly urban project" intended to animate the street with restaurants and retail and a mix of unit sizes. Polly said the team envisions a rooftop garden and building features inspired by local indigenous geometry and energy‑saving shutters: "Our goal is that this building can perhaps approach net zero, but certainly gold and platinum on an energy usage standpoint." He asked council for feedback and said the applicant would refine the design.
Public commenters were divided. Business representatives including Tatiana, speaking for Country Sun, raised concerns about deliveries and the effect of closing or altering Mimosa Lane on their operations and asked for clarity about any proposed use of the right‑of‑way. Residents and nearby business owners voiced worries about the building’s scale, possible loss of alley access for trash and delivery staging, the mural on the Country Sun wall, and architecture that some called out of context with the street. Other speakers said the site is appropriate for housing because of its proximity to transit and retail and urged council to move forward to address housing needs.
Council members praised the site’s potential for housing near transit while repeatedly pressing staff and the applicant to resolve service, safety and right‑of‑way concerns. Council Member Rekdal called out the building’s scale relative to adjacent one‑story structures and urged protections for Mimosa Lane access and fire access. Multiple council members asked that the below‑market‑rate (BMR) units meet the 20 percent council target and said shared rooftop open space should be accessible to all residents rather than private decks for single units.
Callas and other staff said the prescreening does not require environmental review and does not bind the city; a formal development application would trigger a full review under the California Environmental Quality Act and more detailed analysis of refuse staging, refuse room sizing, loading access, and transportation impacts. Council members requested additional information on refuse handling, fire access, the transportation impacts on adjacent alleys and the BMR distribution across building floors.
The council provided extensive informal feedback to staff and the applicant and did not take a final vote. The project may return as a formal PHZ application with the issues flagged by staff and council addressed.
Ending: The prescreening gave the applicant an early sense of council priorities, including transit‑oriented housing, BMR distribution, and protecting small local businesses and alley access; staff said the city will evaluate a formal application under CEQA and city codes before any approvals.

