Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Design Guidelines topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historic Resources Board reviews Spreckels design guidelines as a model for Salinas
Summary
The Historic Resources Board discussed the 1999 Spreckels Design Guidelines and recommended training, clearer permit flowcharts and local design guidance tied to the upcoming Salinas historic survey.
The Historic Resources Board on a September meeting reviewed the 1999 Spreckels Design Guidelines and discussed using that document as a model for Salinas, emphasizing training for board members and clearer permit procedures for flagged historic properties.
Board members and staff said the Spreckels guidelines clearly describe building types, show how to handle additions so alterations are visually hidden from the street and reference the Secretary of the Interior’s guidance and applicable Monterey County historic practices. Sal, a staff presenter, said the guidelines “describe very thoroughly what makes [the buildings] very unique” and noted the document contains a design process, zoning maps and illustrations to guide property owners, architects and reviewers.
Board members said the document’s graphics — for example, drawings of double-hung windows and lists of inappropriate replacement materials such as aluminum siding — make the guidance practical for homeowners and contractors. Several members recommended making similar, Salinas-specific material publicly available online so owners would understand what is allowed and what to expect during the permit process.
The board discussed training for members so everyone is applying the same criteria during reviews, and suggested developing a permit-flow checklist or flowchart that could be attached to permit applications. Board member Munoz recommended that a small subcommittee or an expert walk the board through the guidelines “to take us by the hand” and explained that training should cover what being placed on an inventory or flagged means for a property owner.
Some members urged caution about inserting the board into every minor alteration because that could delay homeowners and add administrative burden. Planning staff said the planning department currently flags projects it believes may be historic and brings those to the board; staff offered to present training and examples at a future meeting and to assemble best-practice resources for rehabilitation guidance.
The board asked staff to bring examples of how a flagged property appears in city systems and recommended coordinating with the city’s permit center and planning department so the review process is clear to applicants. Several members suggested the board consider contracting a local consultant familiar with Salinas’ earlier studies to help tailor guidance.
Members said the Spreckels document would be a useful, publicly accessible resource while Salinas finalizes its own survey and context statement.
