Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Hiring And Background Checks topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Talawanda board debates in-house fingerprinting, hiring practices after hiring-related contract termination

5781058 · September 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members discussed purchasing an on-site background-check machine and reviewed hiring procedures after personnel issues prompted the immediate termination of an administrator's contracts. The board approved a slate of personnel and financial items; the termination of Dr. Joseph Hall's contracts was carried by recorded roll call.

The Talawanda City School District board on Sept. 11 discussed changes to background-check procedures, considered an in-house fingerprinting system and approved personnel and financial items amid a separate vote to terminate one administrator's contracts.

Public comment and a subsequent personnel discussion focused on a district proposal to buy biometric/fingerprint equipment from Biometric Information Management at an upfront cost of $6,500, with an additional stated annual fee of about $800. During public participation a resident introduced the purchase request and a board member moved and seconded the motion to approve the quote; the transcript records the motion and second but does not record a roll-call result for that specific motion in the public portion of the transcript.

Superintendent Dr. Thoreau and other administrators briefed the board on hiring procedures after a recent hiring-related incident. Thoreau described the district's existing steps: use of the Attorney General's web-check fingerprint database, FBI and BCI checks for individuals recognized as school employees, reference checks and a wrap-back notification program intended to alert districts of subsequent disqualifying events. Thoreau told the board the district received no wrap-back notice in this case and said the situation was an "outlier" that required additional review and improved processes.

The board voted to terminate all contracts for Dr. Joseph Hall effective immediately. The roll-call vote on the termination showed board members voting yes: Mister Mead, Missus King, Mister Otto, Mister Wyatt and Doctor Howard.

The board also approved grouped financial and personnel agenda items as presented. Roll-call votes recorded for those multi-item approvals show the same roster voting in the affirmative (Otto, White, King, Mead, Howard) when the clerk called the roll on the financial and personnel packages.

Why it matters: Board discussion highlighted trade-offs between speed and due process in hiring. Administrators noted that certified-staff timelines (a July 10 statutory notification tied to certified resignations) create hiring-season pressure that can make waiting for slower background-check results impractical. Board members asked staff to provide a cost estimate for the district to run background checks in-house for classified staff, certified hires and volunteers.

Clarifying details provided at the meeting included the vendor quote ($6,500 purchase; ~$800 annual service fee), typical outside background-check fees (about $55–$80 per check), and an approximate annual district volume mentioned by staff (roughly 200 fingerprint/background checks a year, depending on turnover). Staff said some checks normally clear in a few days to a week; the case that prompted the review took about four weeks to fully resolve.

Next steps: The superintendent agreed to provide board members with a written timeline of the hiring steps and to return next month with cost figures for running background checks in-house (classified, certified and volunteers). Board members discussed possible special sessions to approve late-arriving hires if necessary during the July hiring window.