Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Environment Invasive Species topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lake Elmo Lake Association asks council for letter supporting invasive-species grant

5780813 · September 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A Lake Elmo resident and Lake Association president requested a city letter of intent to support a pending Department of Natural Resources grant application for invasive-species lake treatment and described recent zebra mussel findings and partner agencies involved in a long-term plan.

Wendy Griffin, president of the Lake Elmo Lake Association and a resident at 2835 Lake Elmo Avenue North, told the Lake Elmo City Council during public comment on Aug. 25 that the association has been accepted to apply for a DNR funding program and asked the city to provide a letter of intent supporting the association—s grant application.

"We were here a couple months ago to tell you that we had submitted a grant into the DNR," Griffin said. She said the grant, if awarded, would fund a full-lake treatment to address Eurasian milfoil and curly pondweed and that the association is developing a five-year plan to address zebra mussels, which were recently found in Lake Elmo. Griffin identified partners in planning and treatment work as Patrick from PLM (a weed-removal contractor), Meg Ratti from Bar Engineering, Valley Branch (partner on zebra-mussel planning) and the Washington Conservation District for other invasive-species assistance.

Griffin asked the city to supply a letter of intent that would show municipal support for the association—s DNR funding application. She also thanked the council and staff for a recent Saturday community event and suggested the city consider bringing back a street dance or festival for residents.

No council action was taken during the meeting on the request; staff did not announce a response timeline on the record.