Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Mechanical Equipment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
St. Clair Shores council adopts revised mechanical-equipment arbitration policy, directs ordinance update
Summary
Council approved a revised city policy to streamline appeals over placement of outdoor mechanical equipment and directed staff to return with ordinance language to match the policy; the change creates an administrative approval route and routes unresolved appeals to the Building and Property Maintenance Board of Appeals.
The St. Clair Shores City Council on Sept. 15 adopted a revised policy that changes how residents appeal zoning rules for the placement of outdoor mechanical equipment such as air-conditioner condensers.
The policy establishes an administrative approval route for replacing units that meet three conditions: the existing unit is a nonconforming installation (already at the side or rear of the house), the replacement is the same or smaller in physical size, and the homeowner submits a neighbor’s signed letter of agreement. If the three criteria cannot be met, appeals will go to the Building and Property Maintenance Board of Appeals.
City staff member Denise Pike told the council the mechanical equipment arbitration board created in 1994 is now effectively nonfunctional because it has only one member. Pike said the proposed policy would streamline the process by directing appeals to an existing board of appeals and by setting clear criteria for an administrative route.
Council members asked several clarifying questions during discussion. Council member John (last name on the record: Karen) and others asked whether “existing nonconforming” meant staff would verify historical permits; Pike said the city’s permit records go back only to February of an earlier system and that staff sometimes cannot locate an original permit, so the policy treats equipment that is visibly on the side of a house as an existing nonconformity.
Councilmember Ron Vitale and others proposed small changes during debate: allow a replacement unit that is the same size or smaller (rather than strictly the same capacity) and require the neighbor letter to identify the specific unit being replaced. Councils also asked that the administrative criteria be published where residents would see them (for example on the permit application) and directed staff to return with an amendment to ordinance section 8-6-166 so the ordinance and policy match.
Council member Ron Frederick moved to adopt the policy with the notations discussed and to instruct administration to prepare the corresponding ordinance amendment and public-notice updates; the motion was seconded and carried on a voice vote with all members present voting in favor.
The policy is effective immediately; the council asked staff to place an ordinance amendment on a future consent agenda once legal review and required notice are completed.
Council members and staff said the change is intended to preserve a clear appeals path for residents while reducing administrative burden caused by a board that has not been able to meet.
The council also directed staff to include the administrative-approval criteria on the mechanical permit form to increase resident awareness of the option.
