Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Permitting Portal topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Zoning staff demonstrate OpenGov portal and complaint workflow; council asks for ward-level complaint updates

5780692 · September 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City zoning staff demonstrated a new OpenGov permitting and complaint portal, showed how anonymous submissions and attachments work, and explained a 14-day follow-up workflow. Councilors requested a monthly ward breakdown of complaints.

Zoning staff on Monday demonstrated Norton’s new OpenGov permitting and property-maintenance portal and described how the city will receive, track and respond to complaints submitted online.

Lisa (zoning engineering staff) and Bill Bremen (zoning/inspector workflow) showed the portal’s public pages for permits, boards and commissions, and property-maintenance complaints. Staff demonstrated creating a complaint, attaching photos, searching by address or parcel number and how the system assigns a complaint number. The portal includes a workflow that notifies staff, provides a 14‑day follow-up due date for the initial inspection or response and allows staff to send internal and public messages against a complaint record.

Staff explained that the complaint form can be submitted anonymously if the filer enters “NA” in contact fields; an email address is required by the portal for notification, but staff said the zoning office’s internal view does not display private contact details to employees. Once a complaint arrives in the system, staff members receive an email alert and then complete review steps in OpenGov; the staff demonstration showed how a submission appears on the employee workflow and how attachments and complaint history are logged.

Council members asked operational questions. One councilor asked whether ward-specific reports could be provided so council members know when there are complaints in their wards. Staff and the mayor agreed to consider a monthly report that breaks complaints down by ward and complaint type (i.e., tall grass, junk vehicles, noise, property maintenance). Councilors also discussed anonymous versus attributable complaints; staff said anonymous submissions are permitted but that an email is needed for the portal’s notification feature.

Staff noted that attachments are optional but helpful, and that each complaint receives a number for tracking. The portal’s due-date feature produces an alert after 14 days if follow-up is required. City staff said they will continue to refine the portal as more users begin to file permits and complaints online.