Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Commercial Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners weigh ‘professional services’ label, PD zoning and business‑park placement
Summary
At the Sept. 17 Orem Planning Commission work session, commissioners questioned the "professional services" label and debated whether PD zoning should be constrained; staff was asked to align general‑plan categories with existing PO and BP zones.
Orem — Orem planning staff and commissioners spent a substantial portion of their Sept. 17 work session on commercial land‑use language, focusing on how to name and use categories such as professional services, neighborhood commercial and business park. Commissioners also discussed the role of PD (planned development) zoning and whether the general plan should discourage PD as a catch‑all option.
The chair read aloud the current general‑plan description of professional services during discussion: "The professional service classification is established as a low impact professional office use for buffering between collector or arterial roads and residential developments," a passage shown to commissioners during the meeting.
Commissioners said the phrase "professional services" is not well aligned with where that designation is mapped today and questioned whether the city should retain the label or rename the category to emphasize "low‑impact" office uses. One planning staff member noted the professional‑office (PO) zone is frequently paired with PD and suggested reviewing the PO zone to ensure it actually imposes low‑impact limits when applied on the ground.
Several commissioners argued PD has been used in practice as a way to obtain exceptions and that the city should consider limiting PD or making the general‑plan categories and underlying zones more prescriptive. Planning staff and commissioners discussed putting business park (BP) into the professional‑office or professional‑services category where BP has low intensity and functions as a buffer, while reserving larger‑scale, higher‑intensity commercial categories for major corridors.
A recurring theme was to recast commercial designations by impact rather than only by name. Commissioners proposed classifying commercial areas as low, medium and high impact (or neighborhood, corridor and regional intensity) and then tying permitted uses and dimensional standards to those impact levels. Under that approach, "neighborhood commercial" is explicitly complementary to adjacent residential areas rather than a destination that draws city‑wide traffic.
Staff told the commission that adopting clearer general‑plan language could make subsequent zoning and PD decisions easier to evaluate because a designation that prescribes low impact limits the ability for later rezoning or text amendments to increase intensity without a clear policy justification.
No formal zone changes or votes took place at the work session. Commissioners asked staff to review how PO, BP and PD are currently mapped in the city and to return with recommendations for clearer categories and criteria that align the general plan and zoning map.
