Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Urban Renewal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board approves certificate of consistency for 12–18 Chestnut Street with conditions
Summary
The board approved a certificate of consistency for a Quincy Mutual redevelopment at 12–18 Chestnut Street, subject to multiple conditions including public art, stormwater controls, construction management, historic documentation and inspection requirements.
The Quincy Planning Board on Sept. 17 approved a certificate of consistency for a redevelopment project at 12–18 Chestnut Street (case 2025 COC 02), authorizing the project as an urban renewal use in Quincy Center subject to detailed conditions.
Attorney David Mahoney, representing the applicant Quincy Mutual, and Carlos Sculte of Veil Environmental Consultants presented technical responses to third-party peer-review comments, covering parking, stormwater, utility capacity and traffic. Planning Department staff recommended approval under the Quincy Center Urban Revitalization District plan as amended and the Quincy Center zoning provisions, with a list of special and general conditions.
The department’s recommended conditions include: evidence of compliance with the Quincy Center public art and placemaking ordinance before issuance of a certificate of occupancy; coordination on required permits (stormwater, drain, street opening); adherence to the 2012 final environmental impact report certificate (EEA No. 14780) and related mitigation reporting; a construction management plan filed before building permits; sidewalk reconstruction, granite curb reset or replacement, new street trees and ADA-compliant ramps; consent from the commissioner of public works for work in Foster Street given recent repaving; predevelopment television inspection of the sewer main and post-development inspection of connections; pre-disturbance erosion-control inspections; inspection and certification requirements for the stormwater management system and submission of operation & maintenance plans; noise mitigation coordination with the Health Department; asbestos survey and licensed abatement if needed; rodent-control plan and dust-control plan; installation of stone or concrete monuments to delineate public right-of-way; submission of AutoCAD files in Mass State Plane coordinate system; and as-built certifications and affidavits by registered professionals upon project completion.
After planning staff read the recommendation and conditions into the record, a board member moved to approve the certificate consistent with the department recommendation; the motion was seconded and approved by voice vote. The transcript records the board saying “Aye” and no opposed votes were recorded in the transcript.
Board discussion included expressions of support for the project and requests for photo documentation and historic-commission review for demolition of structures within the Quincy Historical District. Department staff noted the project qualifies as urban renewal because of the West Chestnut Project Act (cited in staff comments) and that the city, serving as redeveloper under the prior MEPA/EEA certificate, will continue to oversee mitigation and reporting.
