Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Renewable Mitigation Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pitkin County reviews renewable‑mitigation fund outlook; staff recommends CORE funding and targeted electrification spending
Summary
Staff reported a multi‑year decline in RMP (renewable mitigation) fee collections tied to code changes, presented an unobligated‑funds projection for 2026, and recommended honoring CORE’s current request while preserving funds for targeted county electrification projects; commissioners pressed for clarity on prioritization between county projects
County staff updated commissioners on the Renewable Mitigation Program (RMP) fund outlook and proposed 2026 uses, saying fee collections tied to building‑energy rules are tapering as energy‑code compliance shifts on‑site renewable requirements into program HERS scores.
Community development analyst Alex Sanchez told the board that the introduction of a 200,000,000 BTU cap and wider use of the HERS score are reducing the size and frequency of mitigation payments. Staff said they now separate RMP holdings into (a) restricted funds set aside for active projects that may request refunds and (b) unobligated funds available for county use. In the board packet staff reported active projects had driven a large restricted balance, while estimated unobligated funds available for county spending in 2026 were roughly $1.5 million (staff noted the Q4 number was still subject to closing‑out projects and refund requests).
Staff also outlined administrative improvements: county reviewers are initiating refunds when a construction change order demonstrates on‑site mitigation (rather than waiting for the applicant to request a refund at closeout), reducing lag time between project completion and funds becoming unobligated.
Connie Baker said staff’s 5‑year plan proposes continuing RMP support for the county’s CORE (a local climate‑action nonprofit) allocation and dedicating remaining unobligated funds toward electrification work in county buildings (library and health & human services building), in line with the county’s climate action goals. Staff noted the electrification projects already carry other grant money (including a DOLA grant) but leave a remaining funding gap.
Commissioners debated priorities. Several commissioners expressed concern about using RMP funds externally, arguing the county has an interest in using collected mitigation fees first for county‑owned electrification projects; others stressed CORE’s role in distributing funds and supporting low‑income and community energy programs across the valley. Commissioners asked staff to continue developing the 2026 budget with CORE’s request included as presented while preparing options if commissioners wish to reallocate more RMP dollars to county capital projects.
Staff said they would return with a final 2026 recommendation in the budget process and with refined estimates for unobligated RMP balances once Q4 project closeouts are complete.
