Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Olmsted County board approves consent agenda including opioid settlement, HRA levy and contracts
Summary
The board approved the consent agenda by voice vote; items listed on the record included minutes, solid-waste market price, housing authority levy, contracts for county attorney office remodel and victim services, and opioid-settlement approvals (including Purdue/Sackler).
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Olmsted County Board of Commissioners on Oct. 7 approved the consent agenda by voice vote. Items listed on the record included approval of minutes for Sept. 2; establishing a 2026 market price for solid-waste disposal; acceptance of several condemnation or acquisition items (transcript reference unclear on precise wording); opioid-settlement approvals named in the record (including a later explicit reference to Purdue and Sackler); approval of a proposed Housing and Redevelopment Authority levy for 2026; and awarding a contract for a remodel of the third-floor County Attorney area and victim-services work on a lower level.
A motion to approve the consent agenda was made and seconded; the chair called for the vote and the motion carried by voice vote. The consent agenda contained multiple ministerial and contractual items; the transcript did not record extended discussion on consent items during the meeting.
Items on the consent agenda that were listed verbatim in the record included: minutes approval (Sept. 2); establishment of a 2026 market price for solid-waste disposal; an item described in the record as related to condemnation for “Casa 18” (details not specified in the transcript); opioid-settlement approvals including a later entry referencing the Purdue and Sackler opioid settlement; approval of an HRA levy for tax year 2026; and an award of contract for county attorney office remodel and victim services lower-level work. Where the transcript did not provide full detail, the article notes those specifics as not specified on the record.

