Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water And Sewer Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Board approves water and sewer designations for Randallstown Islamic Center
Summary
The Baltimore County Planning Board voted to adopt staff recommendations designating water and sewer classifications for petition 25-01 (Randallstown Islamic Center), approving the change as recommended by county agencies.
The Baltimore County Planning Board voted to adopt staff recommendations for Cycle 43 water supply and sewerage master plan amendment petition 25-01, which concerns the Randallstown Islamic Center at 3117 Bridal Lane.
The board's action, moved and seconded during the Sept. 4 meeting, approved the designation as recommended by the Department of Environmental Protection and Sustainability (EPS) and the Department of Public Works and Transportation (DPWT). Andrew Brown, a DPWT staff member present to answer questions, did not offer additional comment before the board opened discussion and held the roll-call vote.
The vote followed no substantive public or member objections during the floor discussion. Scott Hlutka, chair of the Baltimore County Planning Board, opened the item and called for questions; none were raised that altered staff recommendations. After the motion and a second, board members voted in favor and the motion carried.
Action details
- Motion: "Be it moved that the Baltimore County Planning Board adopt staff recommendation and reports for the water supply and sewage plan amendment cycle 43, petition 25-01 to designate as recommended by Environmental Protection and Sustainability and Public Works and Transportation W6 S1 as requested by the petitioner." (mover/second: not specified in the transcript) - Outcome: approved - Vote (roll call excerpts from the meeting): Mister Aray — yes; Mister Bridal — yes; Miss Brophy — yes; Mister Duvall — yes; Miss German — yes; Mister Heinel — yes; Mister Hinton — yes; Mister Johnson — yes; Miss Lilly — yes; Miss Muneces — no; Miss Pinero — yes; Mister Shulman — yes.
Context and next steps
The petition was introduced to the board June 17 and held a public hearing July 17. Staff members from DPWT were present to answer questions; none of the board’s clarifications changed the staff recommendation. The board’s approval adopts the agencies’ recommended water and sewer designations for the property.
