Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Votes Summary topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: items approved by Maricopa County Board of Supervisors
Summary
A summary of motions and outcomes from the board meeting, listing each formal action and vote result recorded on the transcript.
Get email alerts on the Votes Summary topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors took multiple votes at the meeting on items from the planning, environmental services, transportation, real estate, county attorney, improvement district, flood control district and library district agendas. Below is a concise list of the formal actions reflected in the meeting transcript and their recorded outcomes.
Votes at a glance
- Item 5 (consent/unspecified planning and zoning hearing presence): Motion to approve item 5. Motion moved, seconded and passed unanimously.
- Items 6 0through 09 (environmental services statutory hearings): Motion to approve items 6 through 9 as shown on the agenda; motion seconded and carried unanimously.
- Items 10 0through 101 (board consent agenda): Motion to approve items 10 through 101 on the consent agenda; motion seconded and carried unanimously.
- Item 102 (irrigation easement for Salt River Project, MC 85 West Buckeye Road): Motion to approve item 102; roll call recorded with Supervisor Stewart voting yes and other supervisors recorded as aye; motion carried unanimously. (Item noted to require unanimous vote.)
- Item 103 (power transmission easement for Salt River Project, 100 Seventh Avenue, MC 85): Motion to approve item 103; motion seconded; roll call recorded with Supervisors Stewart, Brophy McGee, Lesko, Gallardo and Chairman Galvin all voting yes/aye; motion carried unanimously. (Item required unanimous vote.)
- Item 104 (SRP power distribution easement at County Mesa Campus): Motion to approve item 104 as shown on the agenda; motion seconded; roll call recorded as unanimous; motion carried unanimously. Public commenter Jamie Martin spoke in favor with conditions (use plan, ADA compliance, shade, utilization reporting).
- Items 105 0through 108 (county attorney/addendum items, including opioid settlement matters): Motion to approve items 105 through 108; motion seconded and carried unanimously after public comment. Speakers raised requests for audited spending plans and independent oversight; county staff described a community advisory board and public dashboard.
- Item 109 (improvement district bid opening, paving project on 130th Street, Chandler Heights Improvement District): Clerk read six bids; the board moved to refer bids to the superintendent of streets for tabulation and award to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder; motion seconded and carried unanimously. Bids announced included (vendor — amount): Brummell Construction Inc — $280,994.73 (apparent low bid read), Gonzales Asphalt Inc — $318,633.55, Eagle Pride USA, LLC — $349,506.91, Cactus Transport 2 LLC dba Cactus Asphalt — $358,600.50, S and S Paving and Construction — $384,725.44, Sunland Asphalt and Construction LLC — $438,307.25.
- Items 110 0through 112 (flood control district): Motion to approve items 110 through 112 for the flood control district as shown on the agenda; motion seconded and carried unanimously; public comment requested fair market valuations and relocation assistance practices and notices.
- Items 113 and 114 (library district procurement and donations): Motion to approve item 113 (competition impracticable procurement justification) — motion moved and seconded; item 113 passed unanimously. Motion to approve item 114 (library donations) — motion moved and seconded; item 114 passed unanimously. Public comment urged procurement justifications, privacy safeguards, and a donations dashboard.
Other procedural votes on consent and routine agenda items were grouped and approved by the board; individual roll calls were recorded for items that required unanimous approval.
Formal outcomes
All recorded motions in the transcript carried by unanimous votes (5 0ayes, 0 noes) where roll calls were taken; where the transcript shows roll call, Supervisors Stewart, Brophy McGee, Lesko, Gallardo and Chairman Galvin were recorded as supporting the motions. Where public comments were on the record, the board approved the items as presented; public requests for additional conditions, reporting dashboards or contract language were noted but not incorporated into the recorded motions at the time of each vote.

