Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Judicial Appointments District 6 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors seek briefing on superior‑court district 6 appointment and review process
Summary
Board members asked county staff and counsel to schedule a work session on the process for superior‑court appointments in a proposed District 6, and on the Supreme Court’s role in reviewing district‑court appointments.
Members of the Cochise County Board of Supervisors asked staff on Sept. 11 to schedule a work session to explain the appointment and review process for superior‑court candidates in the proposed District 6. Supervisors said they are not fully familiar with the legal path for appointments, the Supreme Court's review role and whether the board's approval is effectively ministerial or substantive.
Board members requested a legal briefing that would cover constitutional provisions, the Supreme Court’s review criteria and the board’s responsibilities when a candidate is referred for county approval. Several supervisors said they want clarity on whether an appointed judge would later stand for election, and what procedural steps the board must follow when the Supreme Court returns its review.
Staff agreed to schedule a work session that includes the county attorney to outline the timeline, legal authorities and any required board actions. No appointment was made during the Sept. 11 session.
Ending: County staff will prepare a detailed briefing for the board to explain the district‑court appointment and review process and any statutory or constitutional obligations.
