Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Water topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chiniak school water system raises enrollment, regulatory and cost questions for Kodiak Island Borough
Summary
Assembly members discussed the Chiniak School’s water system after public comments and staff reports showed enrollment at the nonpublic system’s 24‑person limit; crossing the 25‑person threshold would require upgrading to a public water system under DEC rules and trigger additional regulatory obligations.
Residents and borough staff told the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly on Sept. 11 that the Chiniak School’s water system has been a long-running issue and that a recent enrollment change pushed the school to the nonpublic system limit of 24 regular users.
Sandy Dawes, a Chiniak resident and member of the Chiniak Scribe Board Advisory Committee, told the assembly the issue has persisted since at least 2005 and urged more frequent joint work sessions between the assembly and the school board. Dawes said two students from the Bells Flats area were denied waivers to attend Chiniak this year to avoid crossing the 25‑person threshold, and called on the borough and school district to begin planning for a system upgrade.
Borough manager Amy Williams reviewed the technical trigger: the system is classified as a nonpublic water system because it "regularly" serves 24 people or fewer; reaching 25 regularly served people requires reclassification as a public water system and the additional regulatory requirements that follow. Williams said Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) will not engage on planning until the system crosses that 25‑person mark, and that the district denied further waivers "for fiscal impact" and to avoid immediate regulatory obligations.
Options and constraints discussed: Williams said borough staff have compiled a history of the system dating back to 2005 and included a previous study with interim options such as reverse‑osmosis or cartridge filtration systems and associated cost estimates (in the packet). Assembly members noted past operational problems (a stolen pump and other equipment failures) and suggested short‑term measures such as water hauling or separating potable versus nonpotable supply as temporary responses, while recognizing such measures are unsustainable long term.
Several assembly members recommended planning now: Assembly member Dave suggested budgeting for a class‑1 operator should Chiniak hit 25 students, and Paul urged caution about committing large sums for a small student population without precise cost estimates. Jared and others asked about timelines and noted DEC will provide guidance only after the 25‑person trigger is met; Williams said she had been unable to get DEC to consult in advance. The assembly also discussed potential shared operator arrangements with other borough facilities and exploring connections with nearby public systems, including Alaska Aerospace and Friends by the Ocean, both of which have public water systems.
Community and policy implications: Members noted that increasing housing and borough land disposal in Chiniak could make the enrollment issue recurring; Beau urged more frequent coordination with the school district to address enrollment‑driven infrastructure impacts. No formal action or funding appropriation was adopted; the discussion recorded staff direction to continue outreach, collect test results and options, and consider the fiscal impacts in next year’s budget planning.
Ending: The assembly directed further information gathering and interagency coordination and asked staff to share testing data and the prior study options with the assembly and the school board for possible budgeting and planning steps.
