Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Drainage And Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Worth County approves ditch work order after dispute over private outlet responsibility
Summary
Worth County supervisors approved a work order to address a damaged ditch near Flyway property while discussing whether the landowner or Drainage District 23 should pay for repairing a private outlet tile. Commissioners instructed staff to contact the landowner and signed the work order.
Worth County supervisors approved a work order to repair a damaged drainage outlet after staff reported a tile (private outlet) was uncovered during ditch work and questioned who should pay for replacement.
The item matters because it clarifies the county's position that private outlets are generally the landowner's responsibility, while the district will continue required ditch maintenance—an outcome that affects who bears repair costs.
County staff said an engineer's crew (Colton, from the engineer’s office, was cited in discussion) noticed the pipe while working on a box covered by dogwood and that the pipe appeared to be failing. Supervisors discussed whether the outlet is a private outlet and whether the owner should be billed. One supervisor said the district does not pay to replace private outlets when cleaning ditches, though crews sometimes replace pipe while performing other authorized maintenance. Another supervisor said the pipe in question lies in Drainage District 23 but that the outlet appears to be private and therefore the owner's responsibility.
Board members discussed possible billing scenarios: if the district were to pay, those upstream property owners that benefit from a district lateral could be assessed; if the outlet remained private, the landowner adjacent to the outlet would be responsible. Supervisors identified the on-site property owner (referred to in the meeting as Doug Rosen) as the contact to clarify ownership and responsibility.
After discussion a supervisor moved to approve the work order; another seconded. The board voted by voice and the motion carried.
The record shows the county will contact the landowner about the outlet and proceed with the approved work order. The minutes indicate the district intends to maintain the ditch as required by district rules, but that replacement of a private outlet is expected to remain an owner expense unless otherwise determined by subsequent investigation or assessment.
Details recorded in the meeting: the ditch referenced is within Drainage District 23 and the board instructed staff to contact landowner Doug Rosen to confirm ownership and billing arrangements. The estimated repair cost was not specified during the discussion.
