Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks Recreation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Riverton survey finds low use of existing skate park; council weighing replacement, relocation and funding

5778386 · September 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff reported more than 3,000 survey responses showing most Riverton residents rarely use the current skate park; about 28% supported replacing and relocating the facility, and staff and council discussed Centennial Park and a larger east-side regional park as candidate sites.

City staff summarized results of an online and in-person public survey about Riverton’s aging skate park during a Sept. 16 work session, prompting extended public comment at the council meeting.

Survey findings: Communications and Parks staff said they collected more than 3,000 online responses (filtered to Riverton residents and de-duplicated) and also conducted in-person interviews at the skate park. Staff reported that a majority of respondents classified themselves or family members as "never" or "rarely" users in the past year. About 28% backed replacing and relocating the facility; among those who supported replacement, 54% preferred Centennial Park while about 18% preferred the new regional park proposed east of Mountain View Village. Staff also said the in-person sample at the park showed users perceive competing newer skate parks in neighboring cities.

Engineering and costs: Staff said contractors told the city the existing skate park is beyond repair and would require tear-out and replacement. Budget estimates discussed by council members and staff put a basic new concrete skate park near $1 million; a more fully equipped park with fencing, parking and ancillary improvements could reach $1.5 million or more. Staff said a full design procurement (phases of conceptual design through engineered construction drawings and construction management) would cost about $150,000; phase 1 (conceptual illustrations) was about $50,000. City staff said they submitted an RFP and plan to seek TRCC (tourism/recreation/convention/cultural) funding to pay for design work and reduce city-funded costs.

Community reaction: Public commenters were divided. Several speakers representing youth and families, skatepark users and skate-park advocates urged keeping the park or replacing it close to the current location so walking access remains. Others — including nearby residents, parents and softball organizers — objected to siting a new skate park at Centennial Park, citing parking, proximity to a daycare and a group home, and competing uses for fast-growing youth sports programs. Multiple speakers urged the city to use funding to expand softball fields, add lights, or invest in pump tracks or a bike/motocross facility at the larger 16-acre park site planned east of Mountain View Village.

Funding and next steps: Staff said the council previously designated the skate-park parcel in a 2022 community reinvestment area (CRA) boundary and later aligned park boundaries with the CRA to allow adjacent commercial development and maintain a 300-foot exclusion for alcohol-serving restaurants next to parks. Staff emphasized the 2022 decisions and the city's multi-year planning context for redevelopment of the historic downtown area. The council has not decided to relocate or remove the skate park; staff will return with design-phase funding requests and any grant outcomes. The council also discussed short-term options such as budgeting lights for softball fields to increase capacity while the skate-park decision is under consideration.

Ending: The council and staff said they will continue outreach, evaluate design and funding options and return with refined cost and funding plans; staff also noted that a decision to build a new facility could rely on grants and external partners to reduce direct city capital costs.