Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission recommends folding flood-plain rules into subdivision regulations
Summary
Planning staff proposed revisions that integrate flood-plain and floodway language into subdivision regulations (previously separate) and update surety and related sections; the commission recommended the changes after staff presentation and questions about floodplain standards.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of proposed amendments to the subdivision and development control regulations that incorporate flood-plain and floodway provisions into the regulations and update surety and final-acceptance language.
Rachel (last name not specified), a staff presenter, summarized the package and said the most significant change is the inclusion of Section 8.7 "flood plains and floodways," moving language that had been in a separate ordinance into the subdivision regulations and aligning the village text to a state model ordinance. The village project engineer Andre Youngerman explained technical details: floodplain work must avoid altering base flood elevations, and any change that raises elevation (for example by adding curb and gutter) requires compensatory storage to avoid increasing flood risk downstream.
Youngerman said the changes respond to state requirements and recent NOAA data showing increasing storm intensity and heavier precipitation. He noted that the revisions also required deletion or restructuring of a few subdivision sections (including sections on guarantees and final acceptance) and edits to stormwater, water systems and roadway sections.
Commissioners asked technical questions about the changes; Youngerman and staff said the revisions are intended to reduce duplication between the subdivision regulations and the unified development ordinance and to prepare for a future consolidation of the UDO and subdivision regulations into a single Oswego design manual.
After discussion, a motion to approve the proposed amendments to the listed sections of the subdivision and development control regulations was seconded and adopted by roll-call vote. The transcript shows the chair announcing "Motion carries." The staff memo notes that final clean-up and coordination with the UDO will continue as the village proceeds toward a single-document code.
The commission did not identify unresolved technical objections; staff said the village's project engineer will continue to answer engineering-level questions as the amendments move to the village board.
