Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council accepts revised 'Public Participation and Partners' chapter for Olympia 2045 comprehensive plan
Summary
The council voted to accept the updated Public Participation and Partners chapter of the Olympia 2045 comprehensive plan. Staff presented changes made after public comment, including strengthened attention to youth outreach, representation photos, edits to jargon and policies moved to other chapters.
Get email alerts on the Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Olympia City Council on Sept. 9 accepted the revised Public Participation and Partners chapter of the Olympia 2045 Comprehensive Plan and directed staff to continue final edits. Senior Planner David Ginther reviewed the chapter’s development timeline, public outreach results and substantive edits made in response to public and commission comments.
Ginther said the outreach included an online survey (about 95 respondents), open houses, committee and commission reviews and a public hearing. He highlighted three themes that guided edits: broadened participation opportunities, clear delineation of roles in community engagement and stronger emphasis on partnerships and collaboration. Several edits addressed feedback from the Social Justice and Equity Commission and the Youth Council, including additional text and photos to reflect youth outreach and greater representation of communities “on the front line” and those overburdened or vulnerable.
Ginther said staff moved some land-use and property-rights items (for example, items related to moratoria and transfer-of-development-rights) into the Land Use and Urban Design chapter and integrated other suggestions into chapter text. The chapter adds a new policy (Policy 3.9) that the city will strive to hear from all demographics equitably, and it refines language about reporting back to the community on how public input was used. Councilmembers raised plain-language concerns—asking staff to reduce jargon such as “sub area planning” and to consider broader communications channels—and staff said a city editorial style guide and upcoming staff-report training address plain-language improvements.
Councilmember Madrone moved to accept the chapter “as discussed”; the motion passed on a voice vote after councilmembers discussed plain-language guidance and communication strategies for the public. Staff noted the annotated draft in the packet documents where edits originated and committed to continue refinement across chapters before final compilation of the comprehensive plan.
The acceptance advances the chapter in the comprehensive-plan update process; staff will incorporate remaining edits and bring the full plan forward in subsequent steps.
