Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Labor Contracts topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Administration backs two‑year collective bargaining agreement with AFSCME Local 3080; cost estimates provided

5777640 · September 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County administration recommended council approval of a two‑year labor agreement with AFSCME Local 3080 covering July 1, 2025–June 30, 2027, with step increases and cost‑of‑living adjustments; fiscal impact figures for FY26 and FY27 were presented.

The administration presented Council Bill 61 during the Sept. 16 legislative public hearing and urged the council to approve a two‑year negotiated collective bargaining agreement with American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 3080 (Council 3, AFL‑CIO).

Jamar Harry, deputy chief administrative officer, told the council the agreement covers the period July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2027 and includes a 3% step increase between certain steps effective July 1, 2025, and 2% across‑the‑board cost‑of‑living adjustments effective Jan. 1, 2026 and Jan. 1, 2027. The negotiated package also includes changes to union orientation for new hires, shift differential adjustments for revised work hours, revised language pay premiums, and the ability to convert overtime hours to compensatory leave.

Harry and human resources staff noted the fiscal impact on the county general fund is approximately $123,000 for FY 2026 and approximately $224,000 for FY 2027. Human Resources Administrator Anchue Bennett was available to answer questions and confirmed the administration’s presentation.

No public comment raised objections at the hearing; the administration said it supported the negotiated agreement and stood ready to answer council questions.

Ending: The administration recommended approval of CB 61 and provided fiscal impact estimates; council members had no substantive questions at the hearing and did not vote that evening.