Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Legislation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Assistant to city manager outlines recent Texas bills affecting Leander: siren grants, water‑reuse credits, tax‑limit proposals remain unresolved
Summary
Leander staff summarized outcomes from the recent Texas regular and special sessions that could affect local operations, including passage of a siren/meteorology package (Senate Bill 3) and funding (Senate Bill 5), enacted water‑reuse credit language (SB14) and several property‑tax and expenditure‑limit proposals that did not pass but may return.
Assistant to the city manager Kent briefed the Leander City Council on legislation from the recently adjourned Texas regular and special sessions with potential local impacts.
Kent said Senate Bill 3, which requires more outdoor warning sirens and tasks the Texas Water Development Board to identify areas of consistent severe flooding, passed and was sent to the governor. He said SB3 establishes a two‑year grant program to help install sirens; maintenance costs will fall to local governments. Kent said Senate Bill 5 includes appropriations tied to disaster relief, including $200 million to match federal funds (such as FEMA), $50 million in grants for warning sirens for two years, about $28 million for meteorological forecasting improvements and roughly $5.5 million for campground and youth camp safety.
Kent said Senate Bill 14 — passed during the regular session but unsigned earlier — will require political subdivisions to provide credits for water and wastewater impact fees to builders and developers who implement eligible water reuse, and that staff will analyze how credit calculations should be applied. He described SB14 as vague on calculation details and said the city will consult peers and the bill author on implementation.
Kent summarized several measures that did not pass or remain unresolved: a broad emergency‑preparedness package (SB2) that included local chain‑of‑command and volunteer registration provisions (likely to return); property tax relief proposals (SB10 and other measures) that failed to reach consensus; House Bill 17 (would have required mailing tax‑rate hearing notices to all taxpayers) that did not pass and was characterized as an unfunded mandate; and two expenditure‑limit bills (HB46 and HB73) that would have capped political‑subdivision spending year over year, which staff described as problematic for local budgeting and likely to reappear.
Kent told council the special session was short and many issues remain unresolved; staff will continue to track bills and advise on implementation, budgeting and ordinance needs as language and effective dates become clear.
