Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rail Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council backs planning work on rail safety and quiet zones; CRISI grant referenced as funding source

5777254 · September 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council discussed long‑running quiet‑zone plans for rail crossings, accepted staff updates about a federal CRISI grant to fund planning work and directed management to inventory rail‑related projects and keep existing projects on track.

The council held an extended discussion on Sept. 15 about a decades‑old effort to create quiet zones and grade separations for rail crossings through Laredo and accepted staff updates that the city has applied for (and is proceeding with) federal planning money.

Lede: Staff told the council the city received a Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements (CRISI) grant covering approximately $4.8 million for planning and engineering to study multiple quiet‑zone crossings and two grade separations; the city will provide a 20% match through Kansas City Southern (now CPKC) contributions, officials said.

Nut graf: Council directed staff to compile an inventory of all rail‑related projects and timelines so existing eligible projects do not lose funding while staff pursues CRISI‑funded planning and eventual construction grants. Council members emphasized the need to coordinate with railroads, the state and federal partners to avoid duplication and to prepare “shovel‑ready” projects.

What staff reported: City staff described the CRISI grant as focused on planning, documents and specifications (not construction dollars), which will make projects competitive for subsequent construction funding. Staff said the city has previously set aside capital for quiet‑zone work and will soon select a contractor to prepare engineering documents. Staff estimated plans and specifications could be completed by March–June 2026, after which construction could begin pending funding.

Council action: The council approved a motion directing management to assemble an inventory and status update of pending rail cross‑ings, quiet‑zone studies and grade‑separation projects and to return timelines for how the city will advance them; the motion passed by voice vote. Councilors also approved adding the supplemental resolution related to CRISI grant acceptance to the consent agenda earlier in the meeting.

Background and scale: Staff said a single grade separation had been previously estimated at roughly $25 million (cited as an example), meaning multiple separations and quiet‑zone implementation could total tens of millions. Staff and councilors discussed the need to balance finishing older projects with adding new ones, and to avoid losing state or federal earmarked funds because of delays.

Ending: Council asked staff to present an organized list of rail projects, status, funding sources and recommended sequencing at a near‑term meeting; staff said selection of a planner/engineer would appear on a near‑term agenda and that CRISI planning funds will be tracked.