Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tax Credit No Objection topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee to consider no‑objection resolutions for two 4% tax‑credit rehab projects in the extraterritorial jurisdiction

5777224 · September 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff recommended the committee request hearings and ultimately adopt resolutions of no objection so two rehabilitation projects — Lafayette Village Apartments and Idlewild Apartments — can move forward with 4% housing tax credit applications under Texas law.

The committee heard a combined presentation requesting resolutions of no objection for two rehabilitation projects seeking 4% low-income housing tax credits. Both properties are in the city’s extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) and are owner/developer rehabilitation projects.

Staff described the two projects as follows: Lafayette Village Apartments, a 250-unit family rehab located near District E and built in 02/2006; and Idlewild Apartments, a 250-unit family rehab near District B and built in 02/2007. Resolution Companies was identified as the developer for both rehabs.

Legal process and timeline: staff referenced Texas Government Code section 2306.67071 and said the governing municipality must hold a hearing for a developer to secure a local resolution of no objection. The housing department recommended a motion to request a public hearing (to be set Oct. 8), to hold the hearing on Oct. 15, 2025, and to return for a council vote on Oct. 22, 2025, on the resolution of no objection.

No committee vote was recorded; staff recommended the three-step process for local hearings and actions to allow the developer to proceed with tax-credit applications.

Ending: Staff said they would present additional information and that William Schultz and a representative from Resolution Companies were available to answer questions; no substantive objections were raised during the committee presentation.