Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Arc Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council tables decision on hiring Sports Facilities Management to run new ARC after resident and council concerns

5776452 · September 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council postponed a vote to award operations of the new Aquatics and Recreation Center to Sports Facilities Management LLC, asking staff for more detail about local hiring, financial pro forma comparisons and parks department numbers before moving forward.

The DeSoto City Council on Sept. 16 voted to table a proposed five‑year operations agreement (with two five‑year renewal options) with Sports Facilities Management LLC (SFC) to manage the Aquatics and Recreation Center (ARC) at McCowan Park. Council asked staff to return with additional information comparing the company’s financial pro forma to an in‑house parks-and-recreation management model and to gather input from the parks board and other stakeholders.

Why council tabled the item: several council members and multiple public commenters pressed for stronger commitments to hire locally, clearer financial comparisons to the city’s own parks-and-recreation staffing costs, and a more transparent timeline and final contract text. Councilmembers also requested the parks board be given a formal opportunity to review and comment before a final award.

What happened at the meeting Parks staff introduced SFC representatives — including partner Jim Arnold, JD Woods (vice president of strategic development) and Marquise Singleton (general manager) — who described the company’s national portfolio and the operational services it would bring: preopening support, marketing and sponsorship development, event attraction, staffing, and centralized corporate resources for accounting and human resources.

SFC said it would invest in preopening activities (staffing, marketing, systems) and proposed a monthly management fee structure discussed during the meeting (the company cited a $24,500/month management fee in later iterations of its proposal and a performance incentive structure tied to meeting budget targets). SFC representatives said most hourly and part‑time staff would be hired locally and that senior leadership is typically recruited nationally, but that the city would have sign‑off on full‑time leadership hires.

Residents and civic leaders raised concerns Public commentators urged prioritizing DeSoto residents for jobs and management opportunities. Denise Valentine, a DeSoto resident, urged the council to “invest in our own people,” noting the city’s Parks & Recreation division already holds CAPRA accreditation and has credentialed staff. Dr. Monica Lewis and others asked whether a private operator would divert local economic benefit out of the community.

Several council members, including Parett Parker and others, said they wanted a direct apples‑to‑apples comparison between the parks department’s projected operational costs and the SFC pro forma before committing long term to an outside manager. Councilmember Ken Waters emphasized that this district will host the ARC and should see economic benefit and local hiring.

Council motion and outcome Councilmember Andre Byrd moved to table the item “in order to get additional information.” The motion passed unanimously. Council instructed staff to return with the parks department’s expenditures and revenue pro forma so the council can compare “apples with apples,” and to solicit formal input from the parks board and other stakeholders. The city manager confirmed staff will provide the parks pro forma and the contractor’s most recent contract language for review; the council asked for the item to be returned for consideration at a future meeting (staff suggested Oct. 7 as a possible return date).

Context The ARC is a $55 million recreation project that includes an eight‑lane competition pool and community amenity space. City staff said the parks department initially engaged SFC to help with programming, branding and operational planning; SFC has been involved in preliminary planning and community engagement for months. SFC representatives said they are on the state cooperative purchasing roster used by municipalities and that their marketing, sponsorship sales and nationwide relationships are included in their management package.

What’s next Staff will prepare: the parks department’s operational pro forma for the ARC, the most recent SFC contract language and fee schedule, and a schedule to provide the parks board an opportunity to review and comment. Council indicated a desire to see explicit local‑hiring commitments and clearer transparency on incentive fees and budget benchmarks before any final award.

Quotes Councilmember Parett Parker said, “This facility is in my district… I need this thing to work, and I need this thing to circulate our money here in DeSoto.”

SFC’s Jim Arnold said the company’s “mission [is] improving the health and economic vitality of the communities that we serve,” and described preopening and marketing services the company would provide.

Action taken Council unanimously tabled consideration of awarding an operations agreement to Sports Facilities Management LLC and directed staff to return with additional financial comparisons and stakeholder input.