Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Procedure Ccr topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves ordinance clarifying process for council consideration requests after amendment fails
Summary
After extended discussion, the San Antonio City Council rejected an amendment that would have limited continuations of council consideration requests and voted to approve an ordinance clarifying the CCR process.
The San Antonio City Council on Sept. 18 approved an ordinance modifying the council-consideration-request (CCR) process after an amendment to further limit CCR continuations failed.
Agenda item 21 (posted as 0.91 during the meeting) drew a lengthy debate among councilmembers about whether outstanding CCRs should expire when the sponsoring member leaves office and how the council should route CCRs that are already in committee. Several councilmembers said CCRs originate from residents and neighborhood concerns and should not be unduly curtailed by procedural changes; others argued the existing practice needed clarification so the council nd staff—an manage workload and ensure that items receive committee review.
Council President MunguEDa proposed an amendment intended to alter how CCRs in progress are handled; after discussion the proposed amendment failed on the floor. Councilmembers then returned to the ordinance as presented by staff and approved the measure in a recorded roll-call vote. The clerk read the roll call with all present members recorded as voting in favor.
Councilmembers and staff urged follow-up work to inventory CCRs currently in committee and to bring a clear implementation plan to the Session B committee so new and continuing items can be tracked and processed without confusing delays. Administration staff said they would provide the council a memorandum showing which CCRs are in committee and the status of each.
The ordinance approval restores an explicit process for handling CCRs and clarifies that items in committee remain available for committee consideration; councilmembers said they expect additional discussion in committee about any changes to the CCR pathway and about best practices used by other cities for processing council requests.
